Archives for posts with tag: Ten Commandments

The Gad Fly ver. 1.2.1

The Philosopher


Copyright 2016

Definition of Gad Fly

  • A fly that bites livestock, especially a horsefly, warble fly, or botfly.
  • An annoying person, especially one who provokes others into action by criticism.

The Gad Fly of the Greek Democracy[i]

  • Plato refers to Socrates as the “gad fly” of the state (as the gad fly stings the horse into action, so Socrates stung various Athenians).

The Gad Fly of the Christian Church[ii]

A New Paradigm in Christian Thinkingis the gad fly of the Christian Church.  Christian Churches do not accept criticism, ever. The price of criticism in the Christian Church is excommunication.  Christian sees themselves as “birds of a feather” and a critical bird is not of their nest.  They must protect the income and salaries of the professional Christians, the minds of their youth and the minds of all of their members from the gad flies of the Christian Church. Professional Christians must preach to the choir, instructing them on the religion that they have chosen to put their faith.  The cost of not preaching to the choir is that the choir will vote with their feet and donations, resulting in a loss of income to the church and the professional Christians who probably have children – if Protestant – that they need to get through college and a mortgage to pay off.   If the professional Christians are Catholic, they will not meet with the approval of the hierarchy of the church and will be excommunicated.

Max Planck, the German nuclear physicist of the early twentieth century, stated, “A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.[iii]

The same statement can be made of religion.  Acceptance of a new viewpoint of the existing data on religion can only take place when a younger generation becomes comfortable with these new views and those who are adamantly opposed to these new views die off.

Because of this self-protection of the minds of the youths, the church is destined to disappear for failure to keep up with our knowledge of the universe and the light it has shined on our knowledge and purpose of the visit to planet Earth of the Representative of the Creator of the Universe (RoCoU) two thousand years ago, and taught how the Homo sapiens who have evolved over the past thousands of centuries can get their basic needs of food, clothing and shelter met on this planet Earth and how to live in peace with each other and other nations.

An interesting side note is that Paleoanthropologist has found no link to the evolution of the Homo sapien skull to that of the evolved Ancient Man, leaving open the creation of the Homo species by the “Creator of the Universe”.  Although ancient man and modern man have identical bone structure from the neck on down, their skulls and thus brains are much different, nor is there any evidence of a transitional development from the skull of Ancient Man to the skull (Brain) of the Homo Species. [iv]

The advances in our knowledge of the universe and the life creation process in the last one hundred years, mainly due to the Hubble Telescope and advances in life science, have put the Christian Church in a position where they need to update their theology from religious to pragmatic (cause and effect, science) or face extinction.  The church is clearly in a positon of “grow or die” and the church cannot possibly grow with the determination to maintain their existing course, a course established and handed down through the generations and centuries by people that did not understand the meaning, instructions from the RoCoU and implications of the events that had taken place in the very beginning of “The Way” or the Christian Church.  These events took place in a very religious society and that society, for the most part, saw and recorded these events through a religious lens (perspective).

Case Study I

The RoCoU that visited planet Earth two thousand years ago taught the audience that had gathered around Him how to get along with other people on a one-on-one basis and how nations could live in peace with one another on a nation-to-nation basis.[v]

  • For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.” [vi] From the accepted Christian perspective, their judgments will be judged by a higher power at the end of the life of planet Earth. They do not see their judging others as something that has immediate consequences.  From the pragmatic perspective, the effect of judging others – be it one-on-one or nation-to-nation – will have immediate consequences.  All Homo sapiens on planet Earth are of equal authority; one does not have dominion over another. And as one Homo sapien judges another, so in turn are they judged by those they are judging in real time by the same measure they are using to judge!

    This holds true for one nation to judge another nation. As one nation judges another, so is that nation judged, by the measure they use to judge, by the nation they are judging.  As in the case where the USA is judging ISIS with “air strikes,” the USA is being judged by ISIS attacking soft target (civilian targets, airplanes, restaurants, public places, etc.) with bombing and assault weapons.  The USA has judged ISIS as “barbaric” and ISIS, in turn, has judged the USA as “barbaric”.  This ISIS War has made it impossible to tell the Barbarians from the Barbarians.

Wars of our past have been mislabeled.  We must remember that the President of the USA is also the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the USA.  The orders given by the President must be followed by the USA military forces.  The President does not issue illegal orders.  If the President  orders it, it is a legal order and must be obeyed by those in subornation to the Commander-in-Chief.  One can argue that they do not have to follow an illegal order, but they will probably be sent to the brig while the Supreme Court reviews their case. They will be removed from and replaced from duty and someone else will carry out the Commander-in-Chief’s order.

Therefore the Civil War as we know it was not our civil war – it was  Lincoln’s War.  The USA involvement in WWII was FDR’s and Truman’s War.  Harry Truman was President when the Korean War began in 1950, and Dwight Eisenhower was elected in 1952 and was President when the armistice was signed in 1953.  The Vietnam War was JFK’s initiative and LBJ’s Bombing War; Nixon pulled USA troops out of Vietnam. The Serbia vs. Bosnia, Kosovo, NATO was Clinton’s war.  The Persian Gulf War I with Iraq was G.H.W. Bush’s War.  The Iraq War was G.W. Bush’s War and the ISIS-ISIL War is Obama’s War.

As a professional troubleshooter for over forty years, I can equivalently state that, “A problem must be accurately described before action is taken to try and solve the problem; if not, a bigger problem will be the result.”  By placing the proper labels on our past wars, we should gain some insight as to the right problem to solve.

The Right Problem to Solve

  • Settle matters quickly with your adversary who is taking you to court. Do it while you are still together on the way, or your adversary may hand you over to the judge, and the judge may hand you over to the officer, and you may be thrown into prison.” [vii]

The term “workable compromise” was not coined until the twentieth century. Is it any wonder that our ancestors did not understand the meaning of the above instruction from the RoCoU during his visit to planet Earth two thousand years ago?  A workable Compromise is a solution to conflicts that work for all participants in the disagreement.  The first step in search of a workable compromise is to ask the conflicting subject, “What do you want?”  If one does not understand what the conflicting parties want, how can a resolution ever be found that works for the principle parties?

  • Or suppose a king is about to go to war against another king. Won’t he first sit down and consider whether he is able with ten thousand men to oppose the one coming against him with twenty thousand? If he is not able, he will send a delegation while the other is still a long way off and will ask for terms of peace.[viii]

Here we have the workable compromise on a much larger scale.  In the case of USA vs. ISIS, the question was never asked, “What do you want?”  If we trace back the steps of the previous administrations, we should be able to predict what ISIS-ISIL wants.  The Sunni Muslims were in power in Iraq prior to G.W. Bush’s administration.  G.W. Bush’s War left the Sunni dispossessed from their homeland by the puppet Shiite Muslim administration installed by Bush. Iraq’s neighbor, Syria, was involved in its own civil war; The Sunni Muslims, now still armed with their weapons from the now defunct Iraq Red Army, seized the opportunity and developed their base of operation in Syria.  This new ISIL then made pronouncement on video, in a very barbaric way, for the USA to “Stay out of our fight.”  The Obama administration judged ISIL as “terrorists” and initiated air strikes against ISIS-ISIL as they threatened our allies in power in Iraq.

As described above in Case Study I, judging a nation as terrorist will result in the judging nation to be judged as terrorist by the judged nation.   As the USA conducted air strikes against “hard targets” (military targets) in an attempt to minimize collateral damage (civilian deaths), ISIS-ISIL, in retaliation, began bombing and assaulting soft targets (Civilian Targets).

Judging and the lack of ability to negotiate a workable compromise by the Obama administration has, and will continue to, cost the western civilization much cost in damage, dislocation of refugees and lives of civilians.  It is apparent that even a routine change in the administration by a newly elected administration will not end this conflict with ISIS-ISIL. A resignation or impeachment of the Chief Executive seems the proper road to pursue.  A newly elected administration would be in a position of trying to apologize for the actions of the previous administrations, and that never happens.

The Lens Used for the Viewing of the Facts

The lens one views the facts, events or evidence through determines the conclusions that the viewer will hold as the correct interpretation of the facts, events or evidence. The classic scenario is this: Two men who are walking in the woods come upon an immaculate garden, complete with trimmed hedges, flower garden arrangements, etc.   One man states, “There must be a caretaker for this place.” The other man states, “What a wonderful work of nature.”   The events that took place during the visit of the RoCoU two thousand years ago can be looked at through a religious lens or a pragmatic lens.

There are two and maybe three writers that were able to record the events, of the visit to Earth by the RoCoU and the events that took place, without looking though there religious lens.  Mark, who wrote the book of Mark in the Book of Books, the Bible, was a young man on the perimeter of the core group who became the Apostles of the RoCoU. He found himself in Rome where much persecution was taking place of the “Christians” in Rome.  He took it upon himself to record for the purpose of history the events that had taken place during his life.  He was an eyewitness to some of the events and received reports from those who were part of the core group of the RoCoU.  The style of writing for an historian is to answer the questions, “who, what, where and when.”   Luke, who wrote the books of Luke (Luke I) and Acts of the Apostles (Luke II), was contracted to record the events that had and were taking place in this time period. [ix]  Luke wrote under the guidelines of a journalist, answering “who, what, where and when.”  Luke was an eyewitness to many of the events that took place, he interviewed others who were eyewitnesses of events and he was an embedded journalist with the Apostle Paul on his missionary journeys.  Matthew was a tax collector and a Jew who made an argument to Jews of the authentication of the RoCoU to the Jewish religion.  He sometimes included the “why” in his writings, as did John in the book of John.  This would make their writing styles, “who, what, where, when and why” a little more difficult to sort out the facts from their interpretation of the facts and events that took place during this visit of the RoCoU.  The Apostle Paul was highly educated in Jewish religion and history.  He viewed our relationship with the RoCoU through the lens of Jewish religion and history.  A close examination of the writing of Paul will disclose that his view of the RoCoU’s visit to planet Earth was religious and the RoCoU’s view of his visit to earth was pragmatic and the next step in the evolution of the Homo species on planet Earth.

The Gad Fly of the Democracy of the USA

The present day gad fly of democracy in the USA is The Top Gun National Crises Troubleshooter, Retired.[x]  The Greeks invented democracy from scratch and it worked well for them for about 170 years.  The Greeks were on the peak of their Golden Age when they got tired of hearing their gad fly, Socrates, who was a critic of their society, in particular of the shortcomings and corruption in this democracy.  Socrates was one of the founders of western philosophy.  The Greek Senate charged Socrates with “corrupting the minds of the youth,” and they sentenced Socrates to death.  The death of Socrates was the beginning of the downfall of Greece, for they had lost their “guidepost.”

The Top Gun National Crises Troubleshooter, like Socrates has been excommunicated from his position at a national laboratory by management that took offense to his proposals that threated their power structure.  His teaching credentials were canceled in a local church for “corrupting the minds of the youth” and not teaching the church’s official view on the subject. He was excommunicated from a church where he was a member in good standing for twenty years for publishing “A New Paradigm in Christian Thinking” [xi] and corrupting the minds of their youth and any other person in their church with science and philosophy.  Thank God for civil laws that protects our citizens from physical harm.

Our President has not chosen to listen to this gad fly, when he suggested that a workable compromise be initiated to resolve the conflict of space, control and authority in Iraq between the three different sects of Muslims. This was proposed by the Vice President, and now the reining authority in Syria has been added to the mix; he chose to put together a coalition of nations to wipe ISIS-ISIL from planet Earth.  ISIS-ISIL has retaliated with attacks against this coalition of nations and the USA hitting soft targets.  We should expect this activity to continue. The best outcome, using the best military forces on the planet,  for a military victory, will be guerilla warfare with the soft targets continuing to be hit by these guerilla fighters.  The only solution to the ISIS-ISIL conflict is a workable compromise – a permanent home for the displaced Sunni Muslims from their Iraq home.

Lessons from History

In 480 B.C. the Persians were set upon wiping the Greeks off the Earth or enslaving them.  The Persians greatly outnumbered the Greeks.  The Persians were under autocratic the rule of Xerxes; the Greeks were under democratic rule (one for all and all for one).   The Persians overran the Greek Spartans (trained warriors) at the pass of Thermopylae [xii] and sacked Athens, which had been evacuated by the Greeks.

The Persians had large war ships (similar to that of the USA navy, bigger than their opponents).  The Greeks built small maneuverable war ships with a torpedo like Ram on the bow of the ship (A trireme).  The Greeks lured the Persian navy in to the Aegean Sea where there were many islands presenting a maneuverable issue for the Persians.  With their mobility (like ISIS-ISIL), the Greeks ran circles around the larger Persian ships and rammed the Persian ships with their torpedo like Rams at the front of their ships and sank the Persian Fleet. [xiii]

Beware USA your large arsenal of weapons is being out maneuvered by an adversary who is focused on mobility.

The USA Transition from a Republic to a Democracy

The USA was formed as a republic and has been in a long transition to a democracy in small steps. This change has come about by allowing more of the population to vote in elections and it changed the way our President was elected.  In the beginning, only land owners could vote in the elections.  These were the people who had an invested interest in the profitability of the nation, much like that of stockholders voting in a corporation. [xiv]  The vote has slowly been extended, for various reasons, to other segments of our society who do not have an investment or knowledge of producing a profitable nation (women, teens, those on government assistance).  We certainly have improved on the lifestyles of our citizens, as have the Greeks, but our national debt is rising above our ability to pay the interest, which could eventually result in foreclosure on our property (nation) by our creditors (like the two bailouts of the Greeks by the EU in recent history).

The Life Span of a Democracy

The average lifespan for a democracy is about 170 years, as established by the Greeks.  In the Greek democracy, leaders were chosen by a lottery, thus minimizing payoffs and corruption in the government.  Serving as a leader was considered a duty of citizenship.  Ballots could be cast to remove a government leader from office and they would be exiled for ten years from their society. In the Greek democracy, only about 20 percent of the population could vote. [xv]   The Greeks now have more people on the government payroll than people paying taxes to support the government. Is this direction the USA wants to continue to pursue?

The Code of Conduct to Live Long in this Land

There is a “code of conduct” that was intended to provide for the continued success of a nation living long in the land that had been giving to them.  Unfortunately, these were given to a very religious people and they did not understand the economic implications of these Ten Codes of Conduct.  Unfortunately, these Ten Codes of Conduct are still seen as religious by almost our entire society, religious and secular alike.  When one sets aside their religious lens, the pragmatic lens shows that the economics of these Ten Codes of Conduct can be realized.  The original Codes of Conduct were given in an ancient language; therefore, the proper perspective is to look at them through the eyes of a parent giving instruction to their children so that they might live long in the land the parent was giving them to raise their generations.

  1. You will not listen to anyone but your father for guidance.
  2. You will not form addictions that will prevent you from making your own decisions.
  3. You will not use my name as an authority to cause trouble or discomfort for any other person on this planet Earth.
  4. You will take a day off, after every six days of work, and remember who gave you this land and enjoy your time with family and friends, and you will allow your employees time off to enjoy their family and friends, and you will not mow your lawn on this day and interrupt the peace of your neighbors.
  5. Remember what your mother and father taught you, and hand down those teaching to your children and grandchildren, that you might live long in this land I have given you.
  6. You shall not murder.
  7. You shall not steal.
  8. You shall not give false witness against your neighbor.
  9. You shall not seek an intimate relationship with your neighbor’s wife.
  10. You shall not scheme to gain possession of your neighbor’s property.
  11. You will not build a big mansion type house in your neighbor’s back yard.
  12. You shall keep the walk-ways, of your communities, free of “Foxtails” that injure our pets. [xvi]






[iii] Max Plank,

[iv] NOVA: Dawn of Humanity DVD,

[v] Jesus on judging, negotiating

[vi] Matthew 7:2, The Bible

[vii] Matthew 5:25, The Bible

[viii] Luke 14:31-32, The Bible

[ix] Luke 1:1-4, The Bible




[xiii] National Geographic The Greeks DVD, 2016,

[xiv]  TBC

[xv] PBS, “The Greeks”, 2016


The Existing Paradigm and the New Paradigm Ver. 1.0.1

The Philosopher


An Existing Paradigm is the existing way of thinking and doing that which has become a tradition in any organization. The New Paradigm is a new way of thinking and doing that which has not become a tradition in an organization.

The Church and the Existing Paradigms
A parent does not tell their children the philosophy behind what they want them to do and do so for their own good. The children are not yet at a point where they could understand the philosophy behind these imperatives; the parents are giving their children the instruction, “Do this.”

The Israelite nation was in bondage for 400 years under the Egyptians. Moses was selected to lead the Israelites out of Egypt and out of bondage. The Israelites were like children and they needed to be instructed as children. It is interesting to note here that early in this 21st century, archeologists have found artifacts at the location where Moses reportedly crossed the Red Sea. The artifacts were buried in the mud under the Red Sea and consisted of chariots, armor, swords, and bones. This is certainly proof that the crossing of the Red Sea as recorded in Jewish history actually did happen.

The Israelites were led into the desert, where their daily needs of food and water were provided in the form of manna. Moses came down from Mt. Sinai with tablets written by God, the father and parent of the Israelites. The Tablet contained Ten Imperatives, known then and now as “The Ten Commandments.” No explanation of these Ten Imperatives was given – just “Do this.”
Looking at these Ten Imperatives with the knowledge available in the 21st century reveals the philosophy behind these Ten Imperatives. From a parent’s standpoint and from a national interest viewpoint, these Ten Imperatives were meant to build a strong social infrastructure within this new nation so that they would be stronger than their neighboring nations that wanted to take this new land that was going to be given to them away from them.

From the parent’s view in common English

The first Imperative states to listen to me – I am your parent. Do not go to anyone else for advice or guidance.

The second Imperative states, “Don’t smoke, don’t drink, don’t chew and don’t go out with girls that do.” In plain English, this means don’t bring things into your life that will take control of your life and have a negative effect on your decision-making and your lifestyle.

The third imperative states, “Do not misuse my name for your own benefit or to bring harm or discomfort to any other of my children.” Note that this is an action and not verbal usage, as has often been interpreted. Action and verbal are mutually exclusive; that is, it is either one or the other, but cannot be both.

From the National Point of View in common English

The third Imperative states, “Do not misuse my name”, applies to the actions of the nation, as well as the actions between the children of the nation. This is the reason the USA acts only in defense and not on offense to dominate or rule over other people. We defend the interests of our nation and after defeating an enemy, we do not plunder them but rebuild the nations.

The forth Imperative states “Take a day off a week to rejuvenate your mind and body, socialize with your family and friends” and remember how you came into possession of this land that has been given to you to live in without bondage.
The Fifth Imperative states to “Remember what your parents taught you, that you might live long in this land that has been given to you”. And parents, teach your children to respect their parents by being good examples for your children.

From the National Economics Point of View in common English

The sixth Imperative states “Do not eliminate my other children from the face of this earth.” We are bound together as a nation and eliminating one of us will have a negative effect on our national economy.

The seventh Imperative states, “Give your children a home to grow up in so they do not come into the safety net that is supported by our tax dollars.” Make sure they have parental roles models after which to model their own lives. Wives, take responsibility to keep the family fortune, large or small, intacti.

The eighth Imperative states, “If you need anything to help you through this life, I will provide it for you. All you need to do is ask me.” “Do I not take care of the birds in the air and the flowers in the field?”ii “Ask and it will be given to you”iii. Do not take it from my other children. Such action will only cost the taxpayers more money to mitigate the results of such action.

The ninth Imperative states “Don’t tell lies about your neighbors”; be truthful and do not cause the taxpayers the cost of providing for your neighbor because you were untruthful.

The Tenth Imperative states “Don’t let your eyes wander to your neighbor’s property, his wife or anything that is in the possession of your neighbor.” Untruthful neighbors cost the taxpayer more money to mitigate all that results from such actions.

Misinterpretation of these Ten Imperatives led to the existing paradigm The Savior, a.k.a. Jesus, was faced with when he bought us a new paradigm and a new relationship with our Father in Heaveniv. And it has been proven throughout our history that those that are well-versed and financially dependent on the existing paradigm will not accept the new paradigm. In fact, their education in the existing paradigm will prevent them from accepting the new paradigm. Such was the case of Nicodemus.v

The New Paradigm that the Savior brought to us as interpreted by his followers and church planters over the next 20 centuries is now the Existing Paradigm. Unfortunately, the Savior’s followers and church planters and leaders did not make a complete break from the Existing Paradigm that the Savior had come to replace. Rather, they married the two together into what is now the Existing Paradigm.

The same situation that both Jesus and the Apostle Paul (the church planter) encountered with those heavily educated in the Existing Paradigm now exists in the 21st century. Fortunately, at least in the USA, science has come to replace the now Existing Paradigm and fewer people are educated in the Existing Paradigm of the Christian Faith. This leaves the USA open for a New Paradigm in Christian Thinking that is based on science rather than on the religious paradigm that has been passed down through 20 centuries.

The difficulty is that this is “Mind Science” – something that we know very little about. Others have written about “The power of positive thinking,”vi and others have performed experiments that show that some men come to know that “God is the most important person in their life” between the ages of 35 and 39.vii A preliminary Adlerian Psychology survey of those involved in science and those involved in church activities showed that the firstborns in their family tend to go into the sciences and the younger of two brothers tend be involved in church activities. These preliminary studies certainly indicate that the Gospel of The Savior is as much if not more science as religion.

The New Paradigm

The Savior brought in a new deal that is not hinged upon or dependent on the previous or existing paradigms; it is a stand along paradigm. Just as a parent raises their children to be able to live on this planet independently and make decisions independently, so did The Savior, who empowered all of mankind – Homo Sapiens – to live independently and make decisions independently and to be self-empowered though the guidance of the Personal Counselor that he sent us on his return to Heaven. We do not need a leader on this planet to tell us what we should do and not do; we are capable to preforming those tasks ourselves. Churches do not need a Lead Pastor or even a Teaching Pastor or a Pope, monsignor, Bishop, Cardinal, et cetera to tell them what to do. The Personal Counselor can teach us all we need to know.

So why do we need a church? A church is a place for believers to come together and share their experiences with each other – what they have learned through the Personal Counselor – and act as a unit to do the work that the Savior instructed us to do. It is a place where believers can put the Spiritual Gifts that they have each been given to contribute to the mission of the church. We are not all the same and we were not all given the same gifts, a.k.a. skill packages. Each of us is capable of making a contribution to the mission of the church using the gifts that have been given to us. We were not all created equal. Some have been given more gifts than others, and some have inherited different skills and knowledge. We were all created with equal rights, but we were not all created equal. “To those much has been given, much will be demanded.viii” Do we need to worship the Savior or our Father in Heaven or the Personal Counselor? Do the parents raise their children to worship them? Or do parents raise their children to respect their parents and the parents are always there to pick up a fallen child as the need arises? Would not our Heavenly Father and the Savior expect the same from us? Respect of a parent is a lot different than worshiping a parent. Let us be respectful of our Father in Heaven and The Savior, but let us live the independent lives that they have empowered us to live.

The Gospel has been said to be shallow enough for an elephant to wade in and deep enough for a rat to drown in. We are at the tip of the iceberg in our knowledge of the Gospel that the Savior brought to us on that day of the Pentecost Festival 20 centuries ago. He went to a great deal of trouble, pain and suffering to bring us that Gospel; let’s not get caught up in how he accomplished this task that was assigned to him and let us instead focus on His Personal Counselor that he sent to us on that day of the Pentecost Festival after his arrival back in Heaven alongside our Father in Heaven.

The Savior taught us a great deal about how to operate our equipment, which is our mind, body, heart and soul, as well as our interactions with others and our interactions with our Father in Heaven. Certainly there is much to be learned from this teaching, but as is the case with all teachers, there is never enough time to go into great detail about how or why what he has taught us works. Science and Philosophy are the studies of what our Father in Heaven has given us to work with, finding out the why and the how that makes what the Savior taught us work. Scientist and Philosophers have the same goal, which is to determine and understand the truth.

“People, who are unable to understand perfectly both the Bible and science, far outnumber those who do understand them.” – Galileo, 1564-1642, (The Father of Modern Science, and the first to use experimentation to prove hypotheses).

i My Mother
ii Luke 12: 22-31
iii Luke 11:5-13
v John 3:1-8
vi Dale Carnegie “How to Win Friends and Influence People”
vii C G Jung “Psychology and Religion” ,1938
viii Luke 12: 42-48




“The Ten Commandments” a Great Misunderstanding Ver. 2.0

November 5, 2013

The “Ten Commandments” have been made into a religious symbol and therefore, under “Separation of Church and State” policy, a growing number of individuals and organizations think they should be removed from public property.  The “Ten Commandments” were never meant to be religious and this is probably the most disastrous action that could have been initiated into these “Ten Imperatives”.  They were meant to develop a strong infrastructure in this “New Nation” making them economically stronger than their competitors that would take their land from them.  It is the nation’s economic vitality that makes a nation strong, not its many weapons and troops on the ground.   Philosophically the “Ten Commandments” are “Hypothetical Imperatives” not “Categorical Imperatives”.  A “Categorical Imperative” is something one does because it is the right thing to do.  A “Hypothetical Imperative” means there is a reward for following the Imperative, Immanuel Kant, German Philosopher eighteenth century. Kant thought that there was only one “Categorical Imperative”, “Act as if the maxim of thy action were to become by thy will a universal law of nature”[i].    The reward for following the “Ten Commandments” is that “we will live long in the land that has been given to us” Exodus 20:12, Thus, the “Ten Commandments” are actually “Ten Hypothetical Imperatives”.

  “There are two ways to enslave a nation, with war and with debt”, John Adams second president of the USA. We are in an economic war with our international competitors and the nation that has the highest “National Economic Operating Efficiency” (NEOE) will own the other nations debt.  Theoretically the interest on “The Debt” can grow to exceed our taxable “Gross National Product” (GDP) and cost to operate our country.  In this case we will have become slaves to the nation holding “Our National Debt”.  The “Ten Commandments” were and are meant to form a strong national infrastructure and create a high NEOE, therefore, making us more competitive in the international economic war.  This is not by the will of a “Higher Power” but first year economic principles.  The lower a nation’s NEOE, the higher the national debt, the higher the nation’s NEOE, the lower the National Debt or even a surplus in the budget.  

Explanation of the Ten Imperatives:

  1. You shall have no other Gods before me: Would not any parent tell their children this same thing that they are the ones responsible for our wellbeing so don’t seek advice or help from anyone else.  Our Father in Heaven is the one with all the resources and He’s the one who is willing to give us the resources we need to live on this planet.
  2. Do not make yourself an Idol: These instructions are to a people that are naturally very religious and they are going to find something to worship that is going to take up their time, energy and resources.  This can be extrapolated to modern times to such things as: alcohol, tobacco, drugs, porn, gambling and many more things that can take control of our lives.  The Russian Psychologist, Ivan Pavlov, showed us how easy it is to form a habit through conditioned response by rewarding ourselves for a certain behavior
  3. You shall not Misuse the name of the Lord your God:  This has been interpreted for centuries as a Verbal activity.  This cannot be a Verbal activity it has to be an Action activity.   Do not intent to bring harm, discomfort or kill anyone in the name of God.  This applies to our nation as well as to individuals that make up that nation.  This cannot be both “Verbal” and “Action” because if it were both, someone might make a “Verbal” remark that is taken by someone else as “taking God’s name in vain” and then they chose to bring discomfort to the accused, which is an action in God’s name and therefore, misusing the name of God.   Therefore, “Verbal and Action” of Misuse of the name of the Lord your God are mutually exclusive. 

    Even the Apostle Peter did not understand that “Misusing the name of the Lord your God “ is an “Action”,  as he verbally accused two Capitalist of withholding funds to the Apostles social program after they had sold their land and only gave part of the Capital Gains to the Apostles.   It appears both the husband and wife may have died from a heart attack at being accused of sinning against God by Peter for withholding part of the Capital Gains from the sale of their property. 

  4. 4.       Remember the Sabbath and keep it holy:  The best reference I have seen on this subject states that “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath” Mark 2:27.   We need one day a week to recharge our batteries, spend time with our families and friends.  Everyone needs to choose for themselves what day this will be for them. 
  5. 5.       Honor your Father and Your Mother That you might live long, in land I’m giving you:  We need to learn from our parents and respect their wisdom and knowledge.  They have seen things first hand that we will never see.  “Living long in this land” is an economic reality.  These “Ten Commandments” are classified as “Hypothetical Imperatives” something you do because there is a reward for following the Imperatives.    This is not by the choice of a higher power it is first year economics.   Any nation that follows these “Ten Imperatives” will develop a strong infrastructure and a high National Economic Operating Efficiency.   The result will be that we will be stronger economically than the nations that would like to take our land from us.
  6. 6.       You shall not Murder:  We will not advance socially if we are killing each other.  Each of us can contribute to the economics of the nation and we need all our productive citizens to operate efficiently.
  7. 7.       You Shall Not Commit Adultery:  This is probably one of our nation’s most complicated issues.  One really needs to connect with this “Personal Counselor, Personal Advisor, or Tour Guide through Life that Jesus sent to us at the Pentecost Festival after his ascension into Heaven.  Notice these are descriptive terms for what the literature calls The Holy Spirit, or the Holy Ghost.   These are known as “Horse Labels”  “This is a Horse” or “This is an Elephant” well the former are known as “Descriptive Labels” they describe what the entity does.  To connect to this ‘Personal Advisor” one only needs to make a decision to want to connect to the “Advisor”, the “Advisor” will find you, just be prepared to listen to this “Advisor” advising you (something like “a Birdy told me”), this is all you need to do there are no ceremonies needed not even a declaration of your decision, this decision is personal, private and confidential information, it is between you and this personal counselor. 
  8. 8.       You Shall Not Steel:  Theft causes a great inefficiency in our National Economic Operations.   There are too many police boots on the ground trying to manage these crimes and building more prisons to hold more prisoners is counterproductive to increasing our Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and increases our National Debt.   This could extrapolate to the point where more of our tax dollars are spent building prisons and taking care of inmates than tax dollars allocated to educating the next generations of GDP producers.   Schools and Prisons are in competition with each other for funds from the taxpayers, the more funds allocated to Prisons the less funds are allocated to schools that are producing our next generation of GDP producers. 
  9. 9.       Or give False Witness against thy Neighbor:  Courts are inherently inefficient; we should not waste our tax dollars on false reports of crimes committed.  It costs dollars to defend oneself against false charges, which may be the objective of the one making the false report,  but we must think of the cost to the tax payers as well as the affects our National Economic Operating Efficiency.  
  10. 10.   You shall not covet thy Neighbors house or Wife:  Be content with what you have.   Legal cost to manage greed can be staggering and the negative social issues that result from divorces are numerous and astounding.   All of which are a drain on our National Economic Operating Efficiency and can have lasting effects on others in our society down to the next three or four generations. 

If ad hominem is your style of rebuttal, you would do well to remain silent as to not put your ignorance on public display.  

[i] Robert C. Solomon, Introducing Philosophy, 4th ed. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Pub. 1989, P 385.