Archives for posts with tag: Religion and National Security

The Gad Fly ver. 1.2.1

The Philosopher


Copyright 2016

Definition of Gad Fly

  • A fly that bites livestock, especially a horsefly, warble fly, or botfly.
  • An annoying person, especially one who provokes others into action by criticism.

The Gad Fly of the Greek Democracy[i]

  • Plato refers to Socrates as the “gad fly” of the state (as the gad fly stings the horse into action, so Socrates stung various Athenians).

The Gad Fly of the Christian Church[ii]

A New Paradigm in Christian Thinkingis the gad fly of the Christian Church.  Christian Churches do not accept criticism, ever. The price of criticism in the Christian Church is excommunication.  Christian sees themselves as “birds of a feather” and a critical bird is not of their nest.  They must protect the income and salaries of the professional Christians, the minds of their youth and the minds of all of their members from the gad flies of the Christian Church. Professional Christians must preach to the choir, instructing them on the religion that they have chosen to put their faith.  The cost of not preaching to the choir is that the choir will vote with their feet and donations, resulting in a loss of income to the church and the professional Christians who probably have children – if Protestant – that they need to get through college and a mortgage to pay off.   If the professional Christians are Catholic, they will not meet with the approval of the hierarchy of the church and will be excommunicated.

Max Planck, the German nuclear physicist of the early twentieth century, stated, “A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.[iii]

The same statement can be made of religion.  Acceptance of a new viewpoint of the existing data on religion can only take place when a younger generation becomes comfortable with these new views and those who are adamantly opposed to these new views die off.

Because of this self-protection of the minds of the youths, the church is destined to disappear for failure to keep up with our knowledge of the universe and the light it has shined on our knowledge and purpose of the visit to planet Earth of the Representative of the Creator of the Universe (RoCoU) two thousand years ago, and taught how the Homo sapiens who have evolved over the past thousands of centuries can get their basic needs of food, clothing and shelter met on this planet Earth and how to live in peace with each other and other nations.

An interesting side note is that Paleoanthropologist has found no link to the evolution of the Homo sapien skull to that of the evolved Ancient Man, leaving open the creation of the Homo species by the “Creator of the Universe”.  Although ancient man and modern man have identical bone structure from the neck on down, their skulls and thus brains are much different, nor is there any evidence of a transitional development from the skull of Ancient Man to the skull (Brain) of the Homo Species. [iv]

The advances in our knowledge of the universe and the life creation process in the last one hundred years, mainly due to the Hubble Telescope and advances in life science, have put the Christian Church in a position where they need to update their theology from religious to pragmatic (cause and effect, science) or face extinction.  The church is clearly in a positon of “grow or die” and the church cannot possibly grow with the determination to maintain their existing course, a course established and handed down through the generations and centuries by people that did not understand the meaning, instructions from the RoCoU and implications of the events that had taken place in the very beginning of “The Way” or the Christian Church.  These events took place in a very religious society and that society, for the most part, saw and recorded these events through a religious lens (perspective).

Case Study I

The RoCoU that visited planet Earth two thousand years ago taught the audience that had gathered around Him how to get along with other people on a one-on-one basis and how nations could live in peace with one another on a nation-to-nation basis.[v]

  • For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.” [vi] From the accepted Christian perspective, their judgments will be judged by a higher power at the end of the life of planet Earth. They do not see their judging others as something that has immediate consequences.  From the pragmatic perspective, the effect of judging others – be it one-on-one or nation-to-nation – will have immediate consequences.  All Homo sapiens on planet Earth are of equal authority; one does not have dominion over another. And as one Homo sapien judges another, so in turn are they judged by those they are judging in real time by the same measure they are using to judge!

    This holds true for one nation to judge another nation. As one nation judges another, so is that nation judged, by the measure they use to judge, by the nation they are judging.  As in the case where the USA is judging ISIS with “air strikes,” the USA is being judged by ISIS attacking soft target (civilian targets, airplanes, restaurants, public places, etc.) with bombing and assault weapons.  The USA has judged ISIS as “barbaric” and ISIS, in turn, has judged the USA as “barbaric”.  This ISIS War has made it impossible to tell the Barbarians from the Barbarians.

Wars of our past have been mislabeled.  We must remember that the President of the USA is also the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the USA.  The orders given by the President must be followed by the USA military forces.  The President does not issue illegal orders.  If the President  orders it, it is a legal order and must be obeyed by those in subornation to the Commander-in-Chief.  One can argue that they do not have to follow an illegal order, but they will probably be sent to the brig while the Supreme Court reviews their case. They will be removed from and replaced from duty and someone else will carry out the Commander-in-Chief’s order.

Therefore the Civil War as we know it was not our civil war – it was  Lincoln’s War.  The USA involvement in WWII was FDR’s and Truman’s War.  Harry Truman was President when the Korean War began in 1950, and Dwight Eisenhower was elected in 1952 and was President when the armistice was signed in 1953.  The Vietnam War was JFK’s initiative and LBJ’s Bombing War; Nixon pulled USA troops out of Vietnam. The Serbia vs. Bosnia, Kosovo, NATO was Clinton’s war.  The Persian Gulf War I with Iraq was G.H.W. Bush’s War.  The Iraq War was G.W. Bush’s War and the ISIS-ISIL War is Obama’s War.

As a professional troubleshooter for over forty years, I can equivalently state that, “A problem must be accurately described before action is taken to try and solve the problem; if not, a bigger problem will be the result.”  By placing the proper labels on our past wars, we should gain some insight as to the right problem to solve.

The Right Problem to Solve

  • Settle matters quickly with your adversary who is taking you to court. Do it while you are still together on the way, or your adversary may hand you over to the judge, and the judge may hand you over to the officer, and you may be thrown into prison.” [vii]

The term “workable compromise” was not coined until the twentieth century. Is it any wonder that our ancestors did not understand the meaning of the above instruction from the RoCoU during his visit to planet Earth two thousand years ago?  A workable Compromise is a solution to conflicts that work for all participants in the disagreement.  The first step in search of a workable compromise is to ask the conflicting subject, “What do you want?”  If one does not understand what the conflicting parties want, how can a resolution ever be found that works for the principle parties?

  • Or suppose a king is about to go to war against another king. Won’t he first sit down and consider whether he is able with ten thousand men to oppose the one coming against him with twenty thousand? If he is not able, he will send a delegation while the other is still a long way off and will ask for terms of peace.[viii]

Here we have the workable compromise on a much larger scale.  In the case of USA vs. ISIS, the question was never asked, “What do you want?”  If we trace back the steps of the previous administrations, we should be able to predict what ISIS-ISIL wants.  The Sunni Muslims were in power in Iraq prior to G.W. Bush’s administration.  G.W. Bush’s War left the Sunni dispossessed from their homeland by the puppet Shiite Muslim administration installed by Bush. Iraq’s neighbor, Syria, was involved in its own civil war; The Sunni Muslims, now still armed with their weapons from the now defunct Iraq Red Army, seized the opportunity and developed their base of operation in Syria.  This new ISIL then made pronouncement on video, in a very barbaric way, for the USA to “Stay out of our fight.”  The Obama administration judged ISIL as “terrorists” and initiated air strikes against ISIS-ISIL as they threatened our allies in power in Iraq.

As described above in Case Study I, judging a nation as terrorist will result in the judging nation to be judged as terrorist by the judged nation.   As the USA conducted air strikes against “hard targets” (military targets) in an attempt to minimize collateral damage (civilian deaths), ISIS-ISIL, in retaliation, began bombing and assaulting soft targets (Civilian Targets).

Judging and the lack of ability to negotiate a workable compromise by the Obama administration has, and will continue to, cost the western civilization much cost in damage, dislocation of refugees and lives of civilians.  It is apparent that even a routine change in the administration by a newly elected administration will not end this conflict with ISIS-ISIL. A resignation or impeachment of the Chief Executive seems the proper road to pursue.  A newly elected administration would be in a position of trying to apologize for the actions of the previous administrations, and that never happens.

The Lens Used for the Viewing of the Facts

The lens one views the facts, events or evidence through determines the conclusions that the viewer will hold as the correct interpretation of the facts, events or evidence. The classic scenario is this: Two men who are walking in the woods come upon an immaculate garden, complete with trimmed hedges, flower garden arrangements, etc.   One man states, “There must be a caretaker for this place.” The other man states, “What a wonderful work of nature.”   The events that took place during the visit of the RoCoU two thousand years ago can be looked at through a religious lens or a pragmatic lens.

There are two and maybe three writers that were able to record the events, of the visit to Earth by the RoCoU and the events that took place, without looking though there religious lens.  Mark, who wrote the book of Mark in the Book of Books, the Bible, was a young man on the perimeter of the core group who became the Apostles of the RoCoU. He found himself in Rome where much persecution was taking place of the “Christians” in Rome.  He took it upon himself to record for the purpose of history the events that had taken place during his life.  He was an eyewitness to some of the events and received reports from those who were part of the core group of the RoCoU.  The style of writing for an historian is to answer the questions, “who, what, where and when.”   Luke, who wrote the books of Luke (Luke I) and Acts of the Apostles (Luke II), was contracted to record the events that had and were taking place in this time period. [ix]  Luke wrote under the guidelines of a journalist, answering “who, what, where and when.”  Luke was an eyewitness to many of the events that took place, he interviewed others who were eyewitnesses of events and he was an embedded journalist with the Apostle Paul on his missionary journeys.  Matthew was a tax collector and a Jew who made an argument to Jews of the authentication of the RoCoU to the Jewish religion.  He sometimes included the “why” in his writings, as did John in the book of John.  This would make their writing styles, “who, what, where, when and why” a little more difficult to sort out the facts from their interpretation of the facts and events that took place during this visit of the RoCoU.  The Apostle Paul was highly educated in Jewish religion and history.  He viewed our relationship with the RoCoU through the lens of Jewish religion and history.  A close examination of the writing of Paul will disclose that his view of the RoCoU’s visit to planet Earth was religious and the RoCoU’s view of his visit to earth was pragmatic and the next step in the evolution of the Homo species on planet Earth.

The Gad Fly of the Democracy of the USA

The present day gad fly of democracy in the USA is The Top Gun National Crises Troubleshooter, Retired.[x]  The Greeks invented democracy from scratch and it worked well for them for about 170 years.  The Greeks were on the peak of their Golden Age when they got tired of hearing their gad fly, Socrates, who was a critic of their society, in particular of the shortcomings and corruption in this democracy.  Socrates was one of the founders of western philosophy.  The Greek Senate charged Socrates with “corrupting the minds of the youth,” and they sentenced Socrates to death.  The death of Socrates was the beginning of the downfall of Greece, for they had lost their “guidepost.”

The Top Gun National Crises Troubleshooter, like Socrates has been excommunicated from his position at a national laboratory by management that took offense to his proposals that threated their power structure.  His teaching credentials were canceled in a local church for “corrupting the minds of the youth” and not teaching the church’s official view on the subject. He was excommunicated from a church where he was a member in good standing for twenty years for publishing “A New Paradigm in Christian Thinking” [xi] and corrupting the minds of their youth and any other person in their church with science and philosophy.  Thank God for civil laws that protects our citizens from physical harm.

Our President has not chosen to listen to this gad fly, when he suggested that a workable compromise be initiated to resolve the conflict of space, control and authority in Iraq between the three different sects of Muslims. This was proposed by the Vice President, and now the reining authority in Syria has been added to the mix; he chose to put together a coalition of nations to wipe ISIS-ISIL from planet Earth.  ISIS-ISIL has retaliated with attacks against this coalition of nations and the USA hitting soft targets.  We should expect this activity to continue. The best outcome, using the best military forces on the planet,  for a military victory, will be guerilla warfare with the soft targets continuing to be hit by these guerilla fighters.  The only solution to the ISIS-ISIL conflict is a workable compromise – a permanent home for the displaced Sunni Muslims from their Iraq home.

Lessons from History

In 480 B.C. the Persians were set upon wiping the Greeks off the Earth or enslaving them.  The Persians greatly outnumbered the Greeks.  The Persians were under autocratic the rule of Xerxes; the Greeks were under democratic rule (one for all and all for one).   The Persians overran the Greek Spartans (trained warriors) at the pass of Thermopylae [xii] and sacked Athens, which had been evacuated by the Greeks.

The Persians had large war ships (similar to that of the USA navy, bigger than their opponents).  The Greeks built small maneuverable war ships with a torpedo like Ram on the bow of the ship (A trireme).  The Greeks lured the Persian navy in to the Aegean Sea where there were many islands presenting a maneuverable issue for the Persians.  With their mobility (like ISIS-ISIL), the Greeks ran circles around the larger Persian ships and rammed the Persian ships with their torpedo like Rams at the front of their ships and sank the Persian Fleet. [xiii]

Beware USA your large arsenal of weapons is being out maneuvered by an adversary who is focused on mobility.

The USA Transition from a Republic to a Democracy

The USA was formed as a republic and has been in a long transition to a democracy in small steps. This change has come about by allowing more of the population to vote in elections and it changed the way our President was elected.  In the beginning, only land owners could vote in the elections.  These were the people who had an invested interest in the profitability of the nation, much like that of stockholders voting in a corporation. [xiv]  The vote has slowly been extended, for various reasons, to other segments of our society who do not have an investment or knowledge of producing a profitable nation (women, teens, those on government assistance).  We certainly have improved on the lifestyles of our citizens, as have the Greeks, but our national debt is rising above our ability to pay the interest, which could eventually result in foreclosure on our property (nation) by our creditors (like the two bailouts of the Greeks by the EU in recent history).

The Life Span of a Democracy

The average lifespan for a democracy is about 170 years, as established by the Greeks.  In the Greek democracy, leaders were chosen by a lottery, thus minimizing payoffs and corruption in the government.  Serving as a leader was considered a duty of citizenship.  Ballots could be cast to remove a government leader from office and they would be exiled for ten years from their society. In the Greek democracy, only about 20 percent of the population could vote. [xv]   The Greeks now have more people on the government payroll than people paying taxes to support the government. Is this direction the USA wants to continue to pursue?

The Code of Conduct to Live Long in this Land

There is a “code of conduct” that was intended to provide for the continued success of a nation living long in the land that had been giving to them.  Unfortunately, these were given to a very religious people and they did not understand the economic implications of these Ten Codes of Conduct.  Unfortunately, these Ten Codes of Conduct are still seen as religious by almost our entire society, religious and secular alike.  When one sets aside their religious lens, the pragmatic lens shows that the economics of these Ten Codes of Conduct can be realized.  The original Codes of Conduct were given in an ancient language; therefore, the proper perspective is to look at them through the eyes of a parent giving instruction to their children so that they might live long in the land the parent was giving them to raise their generations.

  1. You will not listen to anyone but your father for guidance.
  2. You will not form addictions that will prevent you from making your own decisions.
  3. You will not use my name as an authority to cause trouble or discomfort for any other person on this planet Earth.
  4. You will take a day off, after every six days of work, and remember who gave you this land and enjoy your time with family and friends, and you will allow your employees time off to enjoy their family and friends, and you will not mow your lawn on this day and interrupt the peace of your neighbors.
  5. Remember what your mother and father taught you, and hand down those teaching to your children and grandchildren, that you might live long in this land I have given you.
  6. You shall not murder.
  7. You shall not steal.
  8. You shall not give false witness against your neighbor.
  9. You shall not seek an intimate relationship with your neighbor’s wife.
  10. You shall not scheme to gain possession of your neighbor’s property.
  11. You will not build a big mansion type house in your neighbor’s back yard.
  12. You shall keep the walk-ways, of your communities, free of “Foxtails” that injure our pets. [xvi]






[iii] Max Plank,

[iv] NOVA: Dawn of Humanity DVD,

[v] Jesus on judging, negotiating

[vi] Matthew 7:2, The Bible

[vii] Matthew 5:25, The Bible

[viii] Luke 14:31-32, The Bible

[ix] Luke 1:1-4, The Bible




[xiii] National Geographic The Greeks DVD, 2016,

[xiv]  TBC

[xv] PBS, “The Greeks”, 2016


Chapter I

The Big Bang

The Origin of the Universe [i]

Cosmologists now accept, in this first quarter of the twenty-first century, that the universe was created by an infinitely small and infinitely dense mass that was dispersed by a Big Bang. These conclusions are based on the data gathered by the Hubble and Kepler Telescopes, launched in the late twentieth century. The Big Bang expelled hydrogen and helium into empty space. Particles on the exterior were given acceleration greater than particles near the center. The hydrogen and helium were attracted by the force of gravity and created nuclear fusion reactors known as suns or stars. Heavy metals were also thrown into empty space and were attracted to each other by the force of gravity, forming planets, asteroids and other cosmic matter, and thus forming galaxies.

The Universe [ii]

Thus, the universe is expanding at an increasing rate with the outer galaxies traveling faster than near galaxies, forming asymmetrical shape (egg shape). From our observation point – the Hubble Telescope – galaxies can be determined by their direction and distance by use of the Doppler Effect. As with sound waves, light waves exhibit this Doppler shift.  If one were standing on the platform of a train station and a fast moving train was approaching from a distance with its whistle blowing, the frequency of the sound wave would increase, raising the pitch of the sound as the train approached the viewer on the platform, and it would decrease in frequency and pitch when moving away from the viewer on the platform. When a galaxy is moving away from the observation point, the frequency of the light wave will decrease into the red light band. If the galaxy is moving towards the observer, the frequency of the light wave will increase to the blue light band. Thus, the direction and velocity of the galaxies has been determined.

The Life Cycle of Suns and Stars [iii]

The suns and stars that form the galaxy systems are created by the gravitational attraction of hydrogen and helium. They, in turn, attract the collected matter, forming a solar system consisting of planets, asteroids, comets, etc. The suns and stars will live out their lives as long as there is hydrogen to support the fusion reaction. The forces, due to gravity and fusion energy, are equal and opposite to each other, giving the sun equilibrium in size, until the sun deceases in size due to the depletion of hydrogen fuel. Gravity will then dominate and attract the remaining material into dark matter millions of times more dense than the sun.  If the sun is large enough, there will be a reactionary reaction and the sun will explode with great force, which is known as a Super Nova. The Super Nova (New Life) will repopulate itself many times over, creating new galaxies. Like biological plants on Planet Earth, galaxies have a birth, life and death and, on their deaths, they repopulate themselves many times over. The result is dark matter that is millions of times more dense than the preexisting sun, and it will provide a gravitational net that will keep the new galaxy together.

Life on Other Planets [iv]

Looking at a small section of the universe, the number of galaxies in the universe can be estimated, and it is estimated that there are about 400 billion galaxies existing at this point in time. [v]  Because planets do not emit light, these dark spots crossing in front of the suns can be observed and the size and orbit of these planets can be determined. [vi] It is estimated there are about four billion planets orbiting a sun in the Goldilocks Zone (not too hot, not too cold) and not too big and not too small, where water combined with amino acids can create life that will rapidly reproduce itself and can evolve and be advanced by creation, as it has on Earth. [vii] Paleoanthropologists have traced the evolution of ancient man to the primates, who in turn, had their origin in the ocean. However, there is no history of an evolution of the skull of ancient man (Australopithecus sediba) to the skull of the modern man (Homo species), leaving an opening for the creation of the brain of modern man by the Creator of the Universe. Although ancient man and modern man have identical bone structure from the neck on down, their skulls and thus brains are much different. [viii]

The evolution/creation of the homo species (modern man) could then take place as it has on Earth, beginning with nomadic hunters and gatherers as the planet warms, making the transitioning to agrarian societies possible. That planet would then, with the development of cities, roads and easy communications between the social hubs, be due a visit from the Representative of the Creator of the Universe (RoCoU), as the next step in this evolutionary process. The RoCoU would then teach them how to live successfully on this created Planet Earth; how to get their physical needs met on this planet, how to live with each other and how to live with other developing nations. [ix]

The Arrival of the RoCoU and the Guiding Spirit

The Guiding Spirit, provided by the Creator, shows evidence of being in the world with the creation of modern man’s brain. Socrates stated that he “was guided by a spirit that kept him from making mistakes.” Socrates was known as the wisest man of his time because he knew that he did not possess wisdom and relied on this Guiding Spirit for wisdom. [x]  The RoCoU arrived on planet Earth in the form of a seed planted into a virgin, giving Him the form of modern man. [xi] He arrived in a place and time that made it possible for His instructions to be passed to all the places on the planet. [xii] His parting command to His disciples was to pass onto the world what He had taught them while He was on planet Earth. [xiii]  He told his disciples that when He returned to His home, He would send them His Personal Counselor to guide them and teach them all that they needed to know. [xiv] He explained to His disciples that this planet Earth would come to an end like a bolt of lightning, [xv] which certainly follows the birth, live and death processes of the suns in the universe. The universe and Planet Earth are estimated to be 13.5 billion years old. Our sun is estimated to have four billion years of hydrogen fuel remaining before it implodes and likely explodes in a Super Nova, giving life to a new galaxy. [xvi]

The RoCoU needed to change His body into a form that would allow him to travel to His home in the universe. This is the reason for Him being crucified until dead, buried in a tomb, and resurrecting from the dead in a form that would allow Him to go to go home or to His next assignment on a different planet in the universe, to elevate the evolved/created modern man to the next step in this process. It’s interesting to speculate on how the RoCoU traverses the universe. The speed of light presents a barrier for particle accelerators. As accelerated electrons approach the speed of light, the electrons gain mass and slow down. Therefore, the new body form of The RoCoU must be able to transverse the universe at speeds in excess of the speed of light. At this point in time, the farthest galaxies are estimated to be 400 billion light years in distance (the distance a corpuscular light wave can transverse in one year from planet Earth).  Therefore, there must be other laws of physics that can be applied once on the other side of the “Speed of Light”.



[i] Steven Hawkins, “The Universe”, Steven Hawking’s University, Pub. British Broadcasting Corporation, 1997, PBS; Stephen Hawking, “Genius” Pub. Bigger Bang Communications LTD, 2016, PBS.

[ii] ibid

[iii] ibid

[iv] ibid

[v] ibid


[vii] Ibid i

[viii] NOVA: Dawn of Humanity DVD,


[x] /

[xi] Luke 2:1-7 The Bible

[xii] Explores Class, Cedar Grove Community Church, Livermore, CA, ca 2016

[xiii] Matthew 28:20, The Bible

[xiv] John 14: 26, 15:26, The Bible

[xv] Matthew 24:27, Luke 17: 24, The Bible

[xvi] Ibid i

Now is the Time for All Good Churches to Come to the Aid of Their Country Ver. 1.2.2

The Philosopher

The USA Needs the Help of All Our Churches:

On September 11, 2001, the USA became involved in a religious war. Like it or not, the enemy is very religions and considerers the USA and its citizens to be infidels and thus worthy of death by any means possible. The USA’s Commander in Chief insists that we are not at war with any equitable religion, but the USA is not in a position to determine what religions are equitable and which are not. As Carl G. Jung noted, “We are surely making a great mistake when we forget this simple yet fundamental truth. If a neurosis should have no other cause at all than imagination, it would, none the less, be a very real thing. If a man imagined that I was his arch-enemy and killed me, I should be dead on account of mere imagination.”i

Separation of Church and State:

There is a long-standing tradition in the USA separating religion and state. The state’s solution to this new crisis is air raids and drone strikes and now, talks about American boots on the ground. In the beginning of this crisis with religion, I thought the churches could be involved with the presentation of the Gospel. But I have reached the conclusion that fighting religion with religion is only going to lead to an argument and not a solution. In addition, there is too much disparity between belief systems in USA churches to be effective at coming to the aid of our country. The churches of the USA would need a major overhaul to even make a small dent in this crisis.

The Gospel more Science than Religion:

This Philosopher has investigated the Scriptures and the Gospel and has reached the conclusion that the Gospel of Jesus is more science than religion. The major elements of tradition in the USA churches are the worship of Jesus, Baptism, the Lord’s Supper and prayer. The first two of these traditions were not on Jesus’s agenda; they are the makings of his followers. The Lord’s Supper was made into a tradition by the Apostle Paul as a solution to a problem with sharing food at the meetings of the converts in his churches.ii The Apostle Paul did not have firsthand experience with the deliverance of the Holy Spirit, a.k.a. the Personal Counselor, thus he only had secondhand knowledge of this event from the other Apostles and Jesus’s followers, who didn’t have a clear understanding of the enormity of what Jesus had sent to us on that day of the Pentecost Festival and ended up micromanaging his churches.iii The main focus of Jesus’s teaching while on Earth centered on prayer and communicating with our Father in Heaven.

Jesus, while on Earth, said that he would send us a Personal Counseloriv. On reaching his home in Heaven, He sent us his Personal Counselor into the world.v He told us The Counselor would teach us all that we needed to On examination of these teachings and events, it becomes clear that the Gospel that Jesus sent into the world was more about science than religion. In fact, it looks more like Mind Science, something of which we in this twenty-first century know very little. Therefore, the churches of the USA can come to the aid of their country – not with the existing paradigm of our understanding of the Gospel of Jesus, but with a new understanding of His Gospel and we approach the new Gospel of Jesus from a science base rather than a religious base. Just as many religious beliefs of the past have been shown to be science and not religion, so can the Gospel of Jesus be shown to be science and not religious. As Jesus told us, “One does not take a piece of cloth from a new garment and sew it on an old garment, nor does one put new wine into an old wineskin for both the old cloth and the old wineskin and new wine, will be lost. Those who have drunk the old wine will say that the old wine is better than the new.” Jesus is teaching an ancient audience about new and existing paradigms. The word “paradigm” had not yet been coined, but this is what Jesus was teaching us. The existing paradigm must be entirely replaced by the new paradigm.

With a science based Gospel, there is a good chance that the churches of the USA could be efficient and effective in defeating what we know to be unequitable religions. Unequitable religions that think the USA and its citizens are infidels that need to be exterminated.

Winning Over the Unequitable Religions:

We cannot win over these unequitable religions with air strikes and USA boots on the ground. The focus must be on the driving force behind this aggression. The USA needs to remember its past, particularly the War in Vietnam. The USA had the opinion that if the USA was in the fight we were going to win. It did not occur to these Commanders in Chiefs that we were fighting against an enemy that wanted to regain possession of its country. We are in a similar situation in the Middle East; ISIS and ISIL were displaced from their country by the actions of the USA and they want their country back. The USA cannot defeat an enemy when they are fighting to regain their home. The USA had a big hand in the development of these new crises. With more air strikes and, with USA boots on the ground, it can only get worse for the USA. This is Vietnam all over again.

Peace Proposal:

A proposal has been made to the presidents of the USA, Syria and the Prime Minister of Iraq, to negotiate a peace settlement with ISIS and ISIL with the formation of four new countries to be carved out of Iraq and Syria. The four nations would be Kurds in the north, Sunni and Shiite nations in Iraq and a new Syria carved from existing Syria for displaced Syrians. Once peace is attained in the Middle East, the Christian Churches of the USA would act to resolve the differences in these religions, by presenting the Gospel of Jesus from a scientific perspective, a non-religious perspective, not to glorify Jesus, but to present the Gospel that Jesus wanted for the world, to connect to his Personal Counselor and let the Personal Counselor guide those who have made this connection. This is the only responsibility of the Christian Churches of the USA.

The churches of the USA can come to the aid of their country if they can make the necessary change from a religious Gospel to the Gospel that Jesus wanted us to have. The universe is a whole lot bigger than Earth and its solar system and Jesus is the manager of all of it. In the days that Jesus delivered His Gospel, the knowledgeable world was smaller than the Earth. But in this twenty-first century, thanks to the Hubble Telescopevii and Kepler Telescopeviii, we now know the universe and the territory of Jesus is larger than anyone can imagine. Therefore, as the Olympic cry puts it, “Let’s go for the gold” and let the churches of the USA make a difference in this small part of Jesus’s territory called Earth.

The Mission of the Christian Churches of the USA:

Our objective must be to connect each and every soul on this planet with the Personal Counselor that Jesus sent to us. We are not here to glorify Jesus as the Lord of this planet but to connect people to him through His Personal Counselor. Jesus taught us to go into our closet and talk to our Father in Heaven.ix In today’s language this is known as “Autonomous Reflection.”x We must teach them this skill of communicating with the Personal Counselor, a.k.a. The Holy Spirit, as the guidance of the Personal Counselor has authority and priority over any written works that has been attributed, by man, as “The Word of God” or the Word of Muhammad or Buddha, Confucius etc. Our focus must be on the Personal Counselor that Jesus sent to us. To quote General George Patton “We are moving forward, either help or get out of the way”.

    This mission probably would best be carried out by members of the Deacons or Elders of a church. The Professional Christians may have a conflict of interest and too much knowledge on this subject.


    i C. G. Jung, “Psychology & Religion” Pub. New Haven and London Yale University Press, P 11
    ii I Corinthians 11: 20-26
    iii Acts 2:1-12 , I Corinthians 14: 1-25
    iv Acts 1: 4-5
    v John 14: 26, Acts 2: 1-12
    vi Ibid v
    ix Matthew 6: 6-7
    x Robert C. Solomon, “Introducing Philosophy” fourth ed. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Pub. 1977, pp 16-17
    “A French philosopher of the seventeenth century, Ren`e Descartes was one of the founders of the Enlightenment, and he is generally recognized as the father of modern philosophy. Descartes believed that each of us was capable of ascertaining what beliefs were true in the solitude of his own thinking. He insisted that he would accept as true only those ideas that were demonstrably true to him. Descartes insisted upon “clear and distinct ideas” and arguments based upon “the light of reason.” The modern philosophy of individual autonomy begins with Descartes. From Descartes on, the ultimate authority was to be found in our own thinking and experience, nowhere else.
    His method is both easy to follow and very much in accord with our own independent temperaments. Descartes used his philosophy to cut through the clouds of prejudice and unreliable opinions. He was concerned with their truth, no matter how many people already believed them, and no matter how few. Descartes’s arguments were his tools for finding this truth and distinguishing it from falsehood and mere opinion.“

Judge and You Will be Judged Ver. 1.0.1

The Philosopher

The First Psychologist

Jesus may have been the first psychologist, for he certainly knew his psychology. “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.”i Today’s psychologist would say that what you say about someone else says more about you than the one you are judging (criticizing). Referring to Adlerian Psychology, criticism rolls off the tongues of only children like water out of a faucet;ii it is sometimes referred to as The Only Child Syndrome.iii Only children are well known for their extreme perfectionism and they tend to think others should live up to their perfection; they will put their trust in tradition and be fixed in their belief system.iv I was visited by our “Only Child” teaching pastor awhile back as we were sitting on my back deck. He said my problem was that my beliefs were “variable that my beliefs were “not fixed.” In other words, I have an open mind; I am flexible and willing to change my opinion when new information or insights come to light. This would reflect back to this speaker that he was close-minded, inflexible and unwilling to change his opinion when new information came to light; the speaker was saying more about himself than he was in telling me about me. He was judged by the same measure he was using to judge, just as Jesus said that he would be judged.

Newton’s Third Law of Motion

Jesus was the first scientist as he certainly knew about science. When one body exerts a force on a second body, the second body simultaneously exerts a force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the first body.v When Jesus says not to judge or you will be judged, there is a simultaneous and equal response to any criticism or judgment, as when you criticize, so shall you be criticized. We are like two life rafts on a still lake. When one life raft bumps into the other, they both move in opposite directions. The same is true with criticism; one criticizes another and the result is they both move in opposite directions.

Ad Hominem Arguments

Along the same lines as criticism are Ad Hominem arguments: “An argument against the person instead of the position.” “The most distasteful kind of irrelevancy is an attack on
your opponent personally instead of arguing against his or her position. It may well be that the person you are arguing against is a liar, a sloppy dresser, bald and ugly, too young to vote or too old to work, but the only question is whether what he or she says is to be accepted. Harping on the appearance, reputation, manners, intelligence, friends, or possessions of your opponent may sometimes give your readers insight into why he or she holds a certain position, but it does not prove or disprove the position itself. As insight into an opponent’s motives, personal considerations may in small doses, be appropriate. But more than a very small dose is usually offensive and it will usually weigh more against you than against your opponent. Whenever possible, avoid this kind of argument completely. It usually indicates that you don’t have any good arguments yourself.” vi

Standards and Autonomous Reflection

This is a common occurrence when one is criticizing another; there are “standards” that have been provided for us to follow and most of these standards have been made into a religion of their own. Unfortunately, some information has been recorded by these standards that actually promote violence towards others, so not even the standards agree on how to treat this subject of judging.

At issue with these written standards is that we tend to put great importance on the written word, even to the point of establishing them as authority under God. Although having this written knowledge available is important for us to know what was recorded in history, this is not a substitute for “Autonomous Reflection.” This comes in different forms in the different religions that have developed form these standards. In one case, we are instructed to go into a closet (a quiet place where you can hear yourself think) and tell your Father what is on your mind.vii In another standard, we are instructed to sit on a mat and meditate, reaching out for this special source of knowledge.viii In another standard, certain times of the day are set for communal meetings in special places with special rituals for reaching out to this special source of knowledge. Whatever the methodology used, the important thing is that one reaches out to engage this special source of knowledge. In one standard, this special source of knowledge is known as “The Personal Counselor” or “The Holy Spirit.” In other standards, this source of knowledge is known by Mahomed, Buddha, or Confucius, etc. Whatever the name one puts on this special source of knowledge, the knowledge gained though “Autonomous Reflection,” supersedes any and all written documents no matter what authority man has placed on these written documents – be it God, Mohamad, Buda or Confucius or any other manmade authority.

Earth a Special Place under a Supreme Source of Knowledge

We have been given guides to lead us through this life on Earth, in this 21st century, the only special place in the universe where life, as we know it, exists. We are reaching out with different technologies, radio waves, laser beams, infrared telescopes, the Hubble telescope, the Kepler telescope, etc.,ix x xi xii to see if we are indeed alone in this universe or if life exists somewhere else in the universe. Other planets in other solar systems in other galaxies have been identified as possible places where life similar to life on Earth could be possible. Planets within “The Goldilocks Zone” (not too cold, not too hot, and not too big, not to small) have been identified in the universe. The building blocks of life exist in plenty in the universe: hydrogen, carbon, oxygen, helium.xiii Therefore, given the right conditions, water in liquid form and gravity about the same as Earth, life similar to life on Earth could be found somewhere else in the universe.

When we find life elsewhere in the universe, let us hope they have also sought out the knowledge and guidance of the “Special Source of Knowledge” so that we do not judge each other, which could have far reaching consequences for us on Earth.

Conclusion of the Research Project:
“A New Paradigm in Christian Thinking” Ver. 3.1

“The Pentecost Festival Event” “The Festival of First Fruits”
July 6, 2014

Topic: The Fast Track to: The Gospel of Jesus Christ (The Good News of Jesus Christ)

This is the conclusion of a research project concerning the Holy Scriptures and Gospel as they relate to our National Security. This project was assigned to this author by ‘Who knows Who”, in the late 1980’s, after giving a speech at a Platform Speakers Club on the topics covered in Amos chapter 4. This chapter is concerned with the results of our social priorities and behavior and how they affect our National Security.

This conclusion is based on a research project on the Bible Books of Mark and Acts considered being the “Raw Data” to be analysis for this project using scientific and philosophical protocols.

Paradigm, Paradigm Shift and Dominant Paradigm:

A use of the word “paradigm”, in the sense of “worldview”, for example, in social science, the term is used to describe the set of experiences, beliefs and values that affect the way an individual perceives reality and responds to that perception. Social scientists have adopted the Kuhnian phrase “paradigm shift” to denote a change in how a given society goes about organizing and understanding reality. A “dominant paradigm” refers to the values, or system of thought, in a society that are most standard and widely held at a given time. Dominant paradigms are shaped both by the community’s cultural background and by the context of the historical moment,

The term “Paradigm”, in this paper, is defined as meaning to go in a new direction and for some Paradigms, making all previous knowledge of the subject obsolete, “Paradigm Shift”. Jesus brought in a new Paradigm, resulting in a Paradigm Shift concerning our relationship to our Heavenly Father, and, as usual with Paradigm Shifts, he was met with stiff resistance from the established way of thinking on this subject; “God is for us (as Jesus taught, the new Paradigm) VS we are for God (the Jewish established Paradigm)” And as is often the case the rebuttals were of the ad hominem style, that is, attacking not the augment, but the speaker of the argument. Thus, bringing a new paradigm into the world of religion can be life threating; luckily we live in a country that had enough sense to create a “Wall of Separation between Church and State” thanks to the forward thinking of a founding father Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826).

A Founding Father’s View of the Gospel in His Day:

“The Christian priesthood, finding the doctrines of Christ leveled to every understanding and too plain to need explanation, saw, in the mysticisms of Plato, Materials with which they might build up an artificial system which might, from its indistinctness, admit everlasting controversy, give employment for their order, and introduce it to profit, power, and preeminence. The doctrines which flowed from the lips of Jesus himself are within the comprehension of a child; but thousands of volumes have not yet explained the Platonisms engrafted on them: and for this obvious reason that nonsense can never be explained.” Jefferson, Thomas (1829). Memoir, Correspondence, and Miscellanies: From the Papers of Thomas Jefferson. H. Colburn and R. Bentley. p. 242.,+finding+the+doctrines+of+Christ+levelled%22. Retrieved 2009-03-28.

The conclusion of this research project is that the Gospel (Good News) of Jesus Christ is the empowerment of the individual by: One, a personal connection with our Father in Heaven, and Two, receiving the gift of the Holy Spirit as a “Real-Time Personal Counselor”. The teachings of Jesus in the four Gospels of: Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are about how to live life and connect to our “Father in Heaven” which is the purpose of Jesus Christ coming to earth, which is found in two sentences within a few paragraphs in the New Testament Bible, Mathew 3:11, Mark 1:8, Luke 3:16. Certainly his mission was multipurpose to include teaching us how to live life, how to connect with our Father in Heaven, what our Father in Heaven can do for us and removing any barriers that could prevent us from making a connection with our Father in Heaven including guilt over past actions or thoughts. The rest of the information in the Bible, and in the New Testament letters is very useful, interesting and necessary information but, is also a distraction to finding the main mission for the visit, the death, resurrection and ascension into heaven of Jesus Christ, to teach and deliver the Holy Spirit.

When someone, and most of the world, thinks of Christianity they think of Christmas and Easter. If most are asked about Pentecost, they would probably draw a blank and wonder what Pentecost has to do with Christianity? Many think that accepting Jesus as their Lord and Savior and or being baptized in water makes them a Christian, but few have heard about being baptized with the Holy Spirit. And this it turns out was the main mission of Jesus Christ’s visit to earth and this mission began during the Pentecost Festival (Festival of the Firsts Fruits) following his resurrection. Reference is given to the two sentences in the New Testament Bible:
Mark 1: 7, 8…. And this was his message (John): “After me will come one more powerful than I, the thongs of whose sandals I am not worthy to stoop down and untie. I baptize you with water, but he will baptize you with the Holy Spirit.”
Acts (of the Apostles) 1: 4, 5 ….”Do not leave Jerusalem, but wait for the gift my Father promised, which you have heard me speak about. For John baptized with water, but in a few days you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit.”
Acts 2:1-4…. When the day of Pentecost came, the Apostles were all together in one place. Suddenly a sound like the blowing of a violent wind came from heaven and filled the whole house where they were sitting. They saw what seemed to be tongues of fire that separated and came to rest on each of them. All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit…..
Acts 2:38, 39…. Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ so that your sins may be forgiven. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off—for all whom the Lord our God will call.”

Peter may have overstated the requirements for receiving the Holy Spirit, AS RECEIVING THE GIFT OF THE HOLY SPIRIT IS A MATTER OF A PERSONAL Will and DECISION. If one wills to receive the Holy Spirit, the Personal Advisor, Counselor and Tour Guide through life, that is all that is needed, nothing else needs to be done, not even a declaration of this decision to accept the Holy Spirit. In fact if you want to connect to our Father in Heaven, “go into your room, close the door and ask your Father who is unseen” for what you need, Matthew 6:6 (relevant to this subject, but the book of Mathew is outside the scope of this study).

Fast Forward to the Present Day

From the beginning shortly after the delivery of the Holy Spirit at the Pentecost Festival by Jesus, a series of events have happed that now place more focus on the messenger or other religious ceremonies, than the message. Examples are Baptism, the Bread and Wine Ceremony of the Last Supper (Communion), initiated in the First Century by the Apostle Paul in the Corinthian Church, Christmas and Easter celebrations and many more add-on’s depending on the Sect. Even some of the Apostles writings focused on Jesus rather than on the message Jesus came to deliver. In today’s investigative world the Apostles would be seen as too close emotionally to the situation to make a clear judgment of the purpose of the visit to earth by Jesus. By elevating the messenger above the message, the Christian Church, is now, focused more on the messenger than the message.


The Gospel interpretations recorded are numerous and the Holy Spirit, at least in most Christian Churches, is now found somewhere in the backroom, not found at all, due to many distracting practices, or how to receive the Holy Spirit has been misinterpreted. Or the purpose of and Working with the Holy Spirit was misinterpreted to mean something other than “Our Own Personal Counselor and Tour Guide through Life”. The Holy Spirit has diminished in importance over the past twenty centuries and is now underutilized in our society.

In fact, the follow-up investigation “The Evolution of the Christian Church” indicates that Jesus did not set foot on this planet to set himself up as an object of worship. But He had other goals, objectives and a Gospel that was overshadowed by putting our focus on the messenger rather than the message. The Gospel message was: that each and every one of us could receive a personal Counselor, Advisor and Tour Guide though life, if we so choose to accept this entity into our lives and listen to the guidance we receive and accept what this “Tour Guide” does for us as we go through this journey of life.

A popular opinion in today’s church is that “we are God’s Servant and God is not our servant, that God leads and we follow”, this is similar to the position of whether a “Parent is there for the child or is the Child there for the Parent”. Can God be considered the Parent and we his Children, “Children of God?” Notice that Jesus referred to “Our Father in Heaven” could this be a redefining of the term “God”. In reality on earth the Parent is there for the Child until the Parent becomes like a child (aged), then the Child is there for the Parent. This idea that we are on earth to serve God goes back at least to the time when the Israelites were given the Ten Commandments by God through Moses. These Ten Commandments are not Categorical Imperative, but Hypothetical Imperatives. A Categorical imperative is something you do because you know it is the right thing to do, when you obey the commands and receive a reward or something else for obeying the command, this is a Hypothetical Imperative. The reward for following the Ten Commandments, given to this new Israelite nation, is “That you will live long in the land that your Lord God is giving you” Exodus 20:12. The Ten Commandments is applied to individuals and many individuals make a nation. The Ten Commandments were meant to form this new nation, made up of slaves for the last four hundred years, with a strong infrastructure so they would be stronger than their enemies who would take away the land that “Your Lord God has given them”.

The Israelites interpreted the Ten Commandments to mean they were servants of God. This idea persevered even up to the arrival of Jesus Christ on earth when there were so many “Rules” that one could hardly help but break on of them. There are many teachings of Jesus that shows that God is there for us, they are so numerous that there are too many to list in this paper. When Jesus died, was resurrected and ascended into heaven, he sent us the Holy Spirit to empower those who accepted this gift as individuals and freed them of a life of “Rules”. But, the Israelites still did not get it right, and the gentiles did not get it right when they expressed a belief in the Gospel of Jesus Christ. The Holy Spirit empowers those whom receive this gift from Our Father in Heaven, and is there to guide and give real time console to each individual who has accepted the Holy Spirit as their guide. As Jesus said “But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you” John 14:26. “For the Holy Spirit will teach you at that time what you should say” Luke 12:12. Although these three books of the Bible are outside the scope of this study (Mark and Acts) does not mean they are not indeed facts.
As stated earlier, Jesus’s visit to earth was multipurpose and as is stated in John 14:3…. “And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come back and take you to be with me that you also may be where I am. “ In today’s church this is taken to mean we will have eternal live in heaven, I would consider this as a benefit of receiving the Holy Spirit, although the book of “John” is outside the scoop of this study.

The Bases for this Research Project:

As a trained researcher and systems troubleshooter for over forty years, this investigation was conducted with disciplined scientific and philosophical protocols’ of investigation. One of these protocols’ are to not base an opinion on someone else’s opinion, but to only base an opinions on the “raw data”, this is similar to a USA Court Judges not being allowed to hear testimony of a witness stating what someone else told them was the facts, “Hearsay Evidence”. The accounts in the Bible Books of Mark and Acts would both be considered “Hearsay Evidence” with the exception of Mark and Luke telling of events they witnessed, and therefore would not be allowable in a USA Courtroom. Therefore, the first protocol is to judge if the “Hearsay Evidence” was given without bias or is the writer’s assertion or opinion of the facts or if the writing was presented as an argument to convince a target audience to believe in the facts (not written to only record the events). This is the reason the Bible Books of Mark and Acts were chosen for this study, “A New Paradigm in Christian Thinking”, The Book of Mark was written by Mark a “Sideline Witness” to the events of the study and appears to have been written in a hurry as to get the events down on paper before the writer was eliminated by the furry that was then in Rome at this time. Luke is a skilled writer and as the writer of the book of Acts, decades after the facts, recorded the events, gathered as a Journalist would, probably in a Journal, recording the good, the bad, and the ugly, without inserting his opinion or interpretation of the events. Luke appears to be an imbedded Journalist in the three missionary journeys of the Apostle Paul as he uses the term “we” in regard to recording the experiences of the missions. Luke also recorded experiences of which he was not present and could only have received this information from someone else, such as Phillip in his experience with the eunuch from Ethiopia. This is the “Raw Data” on which this study “A New Paradigm in Christian Thinking” is based. This “Raw Data” does not appear to be formulated as an argument to convince, instruct or persuade anyone to believe in this “Raw Data” but appears to be a “Best Effort” to document the events that took place at this time in the history of man. This ‘Raw Data” protocol does not negate the data that does not meet this standard for “Raw Data”, these data just cannot be considered under the protocols for scientific and philosophical investigation. The Gospels of Matthew and Luke both contain the “Raw Data” given in the Gospel of Mark and appear to be written as an argument to convince a target audience to believe in the “Raw Data”, this would make them someone’s opinion or corrupted “Raw Data” and not meet the protocol standard for “Raw Data”. The Gospel of John is still under consideration as to its meeting the protocol standard for “Raw Data”. A major component of this standard is the purpose in recording these events. Was the purpose to record the events of the time for no other reasons than to record the events, or was it written for some other purpose, such as to convince a target audience to believe in the events or their interpretation of the events. This decision will determine if the Gospel of John can be considered in this scientific and philosophical investigation.

May 19, 2013

• In reference to Cornerstone Fellowship, The Executive Team – Lead Pastor, regarding Galatians Chapter 2, the Gospel = LDRAH (Lived, Died, Rose, Ascended, Holy Spirit). Jesus Lived and taught about life and how to connect to our Father in Heaven, Jesus Died on the cross , Jesus Rose from the grave, Jesus Ascended into heaven, Jesus delivered the Holly Spirit during the festival of Pentecost.
• This is the same conclusion as this investigation of the “Raw Data” the books of Mark and Acts, by Scientific and Philosophical protocols, and is considered conformation of the conclusion, of the research project “A New Paradigm in Christian Thinking” There are two parts to the Gospel, part 1, Jesus Lived and taught us about life and how to connect to our Father in Heaven, part 2, Jesus sent us the Holy Spirit at the Pentecost Festival after ascension into heaven as a personal counselor, advisor and Tour Guide through life, for each and every one on earth, “A New Paradigm in Christian Thinking”.

If ad hominem is your style of rebuttal, you would do well to remain silent as to not put your ignorance on public display.